and its variants of Quantum Theory as they relate to the double-slit

experiments must begin with a discussion of the relationship between

ordinary language and mathematical equations. The question of whether

every mathematical equation can be expressed in ordinary language

with equal accuracy is central. Is every mathematical equation a

shorthand description of concepts rooted in language and based on the

evidence of the senses, reason and logic? If an equation is not

so based, then it must reflect some level of imprecise definition

or emotional basis on the part of the author. It might reflect

Plato's noumenonal world viz. the primacy of conciousness.

Aristotle's metaphysical world of one's senses can correctly

identify reality. The observer conundrum needs to be exposed

as nothing more than an example of the primacy of consciousness

(mind creating existence) for the fallacy that it is.

The observer causing a wave collapse is based, solely,

on the problem of macroscopic instrumentation measurement distorting

the states of sub-atomic objects and energy which must be addressed.

Is it possible to more extensively study the "what-is-going-on"

with wave interactions, beyond observation of the results,

without creating a completely different experiment?

Copyright @2016 Joseph W Gabriele All Rights Reserved